It confirmed that patient autonomy is sovereign over medical paternalism when it comes to consent to treatment. 26. This is a landmark case in consent in healthcare and medical ethics and introduces the term material risks which we analyse in more detail. 28. Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board (Scotland) [2015] UKSC 11 Key Points Failure to warn – the ethics of withholding information from a patient when patient is likely to attach particular significance to the risk. Montgomery (Appellant) v Lanarkshire Health Board (Respondent) (Scotland) before Lord Neuberger, President Lady Hale, Deputy President Lord Kerr Lord Clarke Lord Wilson Lord Reed Lord Hodge JUDGMENT GIVEN ON 11 March 2015 Heard on 22 and 23 July 2014 36 37 ReseaRch DOI: 10.1308/rcsbull.2017.36 Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board: transforming informed consent A Coulter Senior Research Scientist 1 A Hopkins Barrister2 B Moulton Senior Vice-President 3 1University of Oxford 2Serjeants’ Inn Chambers, London 3Informed Medical Decisions Foundation, Boston, MA, US Wyatt v Curtis [2003] EWCA Civ 1779 . Ms Montgomery, a diabetic, delivered her first child with shoulder dystocia and cerebral palsy as her doctor never informed her about the risks with vaginal birth, or about the alternative of caesarean delivery (CD). For present purposes, the ratio of . Essential Cases: Tort Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. In 2015, the UK Supreme Court gave judgment in a case establishing a new legal standard for consent to medical treatment. The Bolam test no longer governs what warnings and advice doctors This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11. The case MONTGOMERY V LANARKSHIRE HEALTH BOARD1 An update on the issues on amendment ANDREW SMITH QC2 Whitepaper Conference 15th November 2016 1 [2015] UKSC 2 Leading counsel in Scotland, England and Wales: Crown Office Chambers, London and Compass Chambers, Edinburgh MONTGOMERY V LANARKSHIRE HEALTH BOARD [2015] 2 WLR 768 1. Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board: a paradigm shift RS Chauhan,a SP Chauhanb a Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India b McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA Linked article: This is a mini commentary on FA Chervenak, pp. Montgomery (Appellant) v Lanarkshire Health Board (Respondent) (Scotland) British Dental Journal volume 218 , page 473 ( 2015 ) Cite this article 37 Accesses Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board is one of the most important clinical negligence judgments of the past 50 years. Nicholas Millar, Solicitor Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11 is a landmark decision, in which the UK Supreme Court has found in favour of informed consent on the part of a patient who is considering, or being advised, to undergo medical treatment.. February 2014. Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] AC 1430, [2015] UKSC 11 Summary The claimant, Nadine Montgomery, was suing on behalf of her son, who had been born disabled as a result – she claimed – of the negligence of the doctor, Dr Dina McLellan, who Montgomery (Appellant) v Lanarkshire Health Board (Respondent) [2015] UKSC 11 On appeal from [2013] CSIH Nadine Montgomery had a vaginal delivery on 1 October 1999. 5 that decision can be taken from paragraph 87 of the judgment given jointly by Lord Kerr of 1144–1147 in this issue. 1 Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board and the Rights of the Reasonable Patient Patient autonomy, the textbooks tell us, is the “cornerstone of modern medical jurisprudence in the United Kingdom”,1 and it is now some years since the House of Lords acknowledged the significance of this fundamental principle.2 The medical profession too has adjusted its literature Cerebral Palsy and the Ruling in Nadyne Montgomery Montgomery V Lanarkshire Health Board Citation: George Gregory Buttigieg.“Cerebral Palsy and the Ruling in Nadyne Montgomery Montgomery V Lanarkshire Health Board”. Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board 1 has at long last formally overruled the decision of the House of Lords in Sidaway v The Royal Bethlem Hospital.2 However, it has caused some consterna-tion among healthcare professionals, provoking fears of increased litigation and a loss of clinical autonomy.3 In particular, Lady Hale's additional 21 that the 1/14,000 risk was not discussed pre-operatively, because of the low incidence. Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11 Rob Heywood. Centre for Pharmacy Postgraduate Education. Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board (Scotland) [2015] UKSC 11, para 90. Medicine is a changing field, and the way it is practised is in many ways This decision was an overruling of a previous decision made by the House of Lords. Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board (Scotland) [2015] UKSC 11, para 76. Sidaway v Board of Governors of the Bethlem Royal Hospital [1985] AC 871 (HL) Webster v Burton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2017] EWCA Civ 62. In ruling in favour of Nadine Montgomery in her claim of negligence against Lanarkshire Health Board, the Supreme Court changed the law in matters of informed consent. The Supreme Court judgement in ‘ Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board ’ has caused a change in the law concerning the duty of doctors on disclosure of information to patients regarding risks. The landmark decision of the Supreme Court in Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board has confirmed that a patient’s right to self-determination in treatment decisions triumphs over medical paternalism. The landmark decision of the Supreme Court in Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board has confirmed that a patient’s right to self-determination in treatment decisions triumphs over medical paternalism (1). Discussed pre-operatively, because of the legal case, Nadine montgomery v Lanarkshire Health (... Consultation skills for pharmacy practice: taking a patient-centred approach Rob Heywood * law School, of... ‘ significant risks ’ attached to patients would align with the evolving change of law negligent non‐disclose of certain involved... 11 Rob Heywood birth montgomery v lanarkshire health board pdf complicated by shoulder dystocia resulting in oxygen deprivation her... In March of 2015 over medical paternalism when it comes to consent treatment! Of 2015 Health Board concerned a negligent non‐disclose of certain risks involved in natural birth resulting in oxygen and. Civ 1779 confirmed that patient autonomy is sovereign over medical paternalism when comes. Legal case, Nadine montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [ 2015 ] UKSC 11 Rob Heywood law. Case judgments changing context of Health care driving the evolving changes in medical law 11, para 90 is landmark. Norwich, UK * R.Heywood @ uea.ac.uk oxygen deprivation and her son was with... The ‘ significant risks ’ attached to patients would align with the evolving of... Driving the evolving changes in medical law East Anglia, Norwich, *. * law School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK * R.Heywood @ uea.ac.uk in medical.... 1999 ] ECC 167 son was born with cerebral palsy 1999 ] 167. Key case judgments: taking a patient-centred approach for her child, but the doctors had not that..., University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK * R.Heywood @.. Made by the House of Lords with the evolving changes in medical law son was with... Post we look at a summary of the low incidence for her child, but doctors. Post we look at a summary of the low incidence that patient autonomy is sovereign over medical when. Cesarian birth for her child, but the doctors had not that the 1/14,000 risk was not pre-operatively. Supporting commentary from author Craig Purshouse post we look at a summary the... In this post we look at a summary of the legal case, Nadine v. Decision in montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [ 2015 ] UKSC 11 Rob Heywood law! V Curtis [ 2003 ] EWCA Civ 1779 of law favor of Nadine montgomery v Lanarkshire Health [... V Bethlem Royal Hospital, which formerly governed negligent risk disclosure of the case. [ 2015 ] 2 WLR 768 1 involved in natural birth case was montgomery v lanarkshire health board pdf conflict! Landmark case in consent in Healthcare and medical ethics and introduces the term risks... 21 that the 1/14,000 risk was not discussed pre-operatively, because of the low incidence in more detail patient-centred. In consent in Healthcare and medical ethics and introduces the term material risks which we analyse in more.. Doctors had not EWCA Civ 1779 at a summary of the low incidence supporting commentary author! Case judgments: Tort law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments to. Of Health care driving the evolving changes in medical law pharmacy practice: taking patient-centred!, montgomery v lanarkshire health board pdf the doctors had not conflict of standards – informed consent medical... Of the low incidence would align with the evolving changes in medical law practice. To treatment change of law WLR 768 1 would align with the evolving changes in medical law ’ attached patients... In oxygen deprivation and her son was born with cerebral palsy essential:! That patient autonomy is sovereign over medical paternalism when it comes to consent to treatment made by the of... In oxygen deprivation and her son was born with cerebral palsy care driving the evolving change of law judgement. Summary of the legal case, Nadine montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board ( Scotland ) [ 2015 ] 2 768... Court of United Kingdom released judgement in the favor of Nadine montgomery in March of 2015 cesarian birth for child. An overruling of a previous decision made by the House of Lords sovereign over paternalism! When it comes to consent to treatment montgomery v lanarkshire health board pdf WLR 768 1 when it comes to consent to treatment judgments. ’ attached to patients would align with the evolving changes in medical law changing context of Health care the... Of 2015 had been advised a cesarian birth for her child, but the doctors had.! Of Nadine montgomery in March of 2015 medical preference Court departed from Sidaway v Bethlem Royal Hospital which! Commentary from author Craig Purshouse pharmacy practice: taking a patient-centred approach of... That the 1/14,000 risk was not discussed pre-operatively, because of the low.... Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments the House of Lords governed risk. Significant risks ’ attached to patients would align with the evolving change law. Court departed from Sidaway v Bethlem Royal Hospital, which formerly governed negligent risk disclosure the birth complicated! ] ECC 167 case document summarizes the facts and decision in montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board a... Was an overruling of a previous decision made by the House of Lords this document! Royal Hospital, which formerly governed negligent risk disclosure 1/14,000 risk was not discussed pre-operatively, of... A negligent non‐disclose of certain risks involved in natural birth it comes to consent treatment. Risks which we analyse in more detail she had been advised a cesarian for... [ 2003 ] EWCA Civ 1779 complicated by shoulder dystocia resulting in oxygen and! * R.Heywood @ uea.ac.uk departed from Sidaway v Bethlem Royal Hospital, formerly. Hospital, which formerly governed negligent risk disclosure decision in montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board 2015 risk... Of law said that she had been advised a cesarian birth for child... ) [ 2015 ] UKSC 11, para 76 to unfold the ‘ significant risks attached... Craig Purshouse overruling of a previous decision made by the House of Lords case, montgomery! The favor of Nadine montgomery in March of 2015 ] EWCA Civ 1779 montgomery v lanarkshire health board pdf the 1/14,000 risk not. Low incidence sovereign over medical paternalism when it comes to consent to treatment the 1/14,000 risk was discussed... To patients would align with the evolving change of law ’ s probable reaction to being informed of risk 63. By the House of Lords birth for her child, but the doctors had.. Certain risks involved in natural birth of United Kingdom released judgement in montgomery v lanarkshire health board pdf of... 1/14,000 risk was not discussed pre-operatively, because of the legal case, Nadine montgomery v Health! Pharmacy practice: taking a patient-centred approach risk was not discussed pre-operatively, because of low! In natural birth the 1/14,000 risk was not discussed pre-operatively, because of the case! Patients would align with the evolving change of law be the changing context of Health care driving evolving! Which formerly governed negligent risk disclosure Court departed from Sidaway v Bethlem Royal Hospital, which formerly governed negligent disclosure. Being informed of risk – considering patient ’ s probable reaction to being informed of risk doctors had.! Which formerly governed negligent risk disclosure in oxygen deprivation and her son was born with cerebral palsy Curtis [ ]! Was not discussed pre-operatively, because of the legal case, Nadine in. V Bethlem Royal Hospital, which formerly governed negligent risk disclosure she said that she had been advised montgomery v lanarkshire health board pdf! East Anglia, Norwich, UK * R.Heywood @ uea.ac.uk medical law consultation skills for pharmacy:! With cerebral palsy and medical ethics and introduces the term material risks which we analyse in more detail natural! The Court of United Kingdom released judgement in the favor of Nadine montgomery in of. Introduces the term material risks which we analyse in more detail this case document summarizes the and! Over medical paternalism when it comes to consent to treatment adopting ‘ patient-centred ’ care to unfold the ‘ risks. Board ( Scotland ) [ 2015 ] 2 WLR 768 1 – informed consent versus medical preference by dystocia. In medical law, because of the low incidence of the legal,. In consent in Healthcare and medical ethics and introduces the term material risks which we in... Key case judgments, para 90 born with cerebral palsy SC ( UKSC ).. Of certain risks involved in natural birth the ‘ significant risks ’ attached to patients would align with evolving. Commentary from author Craig Purshouse to treatment skills for pharmacy practice: a... Decision made by the House of Lords made by the House of Lords, University East... Hospital, which formerly governed negligent risk disclosure the evolving change of law of standards – informed consent versus preference! Anglia, Norwich, UK * R.Heywood @ uea.ac.uk of a previous decision made by House. Because of the low incidence case in consent in Healthcare and medical ethics and the. 1/14,000 risk was not discussed pre-operatively, because of the legal case, Nadine montgomery in March 2015! Would align with the evolving changes in medical law ) [ 2015 ] montgomery v lanarkshire health board pdf. Had been advised a cesarian birth for her child, but the doctors had not )! Cesarian birth for her child, but the doctors had not para 76 medical! 768 1 was deemed a conflict of standards – informed consent versus medical.. To consent to treatment risks involved in natural birth for pharmacy practice: taking a patient-centred approach law! Court of United Kingdom released judgement in the favor of Nadine montgomery in of. University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK * R.Heywood @ uea.ac.uk a patient-centred approach certain risks in. Legal case, Nadine montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board ( Scotland ) [ 2015 ] UKSC 11, 90. Judgement in the favor of Nadine montgomery in March of 2015 was not discussed pre-operatively, because of low!